Command A vs Grok 4.7
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Grok 4.7 is 45% cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.7 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (46.4 vs 13.1). Grok 4.7 has the larger context window (500K vs 256K).
| Command A | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $1.60 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $4.80 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $2.40 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.40 |
| Context window | 256K | 500K |
| Max output | 8K | 450K |
| Intelligence index | 13.1 | 46.4 |
| Coding index | 27.8 | — |
| Providers | 1 | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is 45% cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs Grok 4.7: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600.
More comparisons
Command A vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A vs Command A+Command A vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A vs GPT-6 SolCommand A vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A vs GPT-6 Astra ProCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5