Command A vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 37.6× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 256K).
| Command A | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.022 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.40 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $0.12 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.004 |
| Context window | 256K | 1M |
| Max output | 8K | 944K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | 36 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-09-10 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 37.6× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $244.00.
More comparisons
Command A vs Gemini 4 CarbonCommand A vs Claude Fable 5.2Command A vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashCommand A vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashCommand A vs Hy4Command A vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalCommand A vs GPT-6.1 TerraCommand A vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProCommand A vs Kimi K3.1 ProCommand A vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Command A vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLCommand A vs Gemini 4 ArgonCommand A vs Claude Haiku 5.5Command A vs Nano Banana 2.1Command A vs Mistral Large 4DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Hy4DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro