Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Command A is 20% cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has the larger context window (1M vs 256K).
| Command A | MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $4.35 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $8.70 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $5.44 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.036 |
| Context window | 256K | 1M |
| Max output | 8K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 13.1 | — |
| Coding index | 27.8 | — |
| Providers | 1 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed?
Command A is 20% cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed ≈ $13,050.
More comparisons
Command A vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A vs Command A+Command A vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A vs GPT-6 SolCommand A vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A vs Grok 4.7Command A vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A vs GPT-6 Astra ProCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Claude Opus 5.5