MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Trinity Large Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi

$0.14 / $0.28

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Trinity Large Thinking

Arcee Ai

$0.25 / $0.80

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.2× cheaper than Trinity Large Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (26.7 vs 10.8). MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 262K).

	MiMo-V2.6-Flash	Trinity Large Thinking
Input price / 1M	$0.14	$0.25
Output price / 1M	$0.28	$0.80
Blended price (3:1)	$0.18	$0.39
Cached input / 1M	$0.0028	$0.06
Context window	1.1M	262K
Max output	131K	80K
Intelligence index	26.7	10.8
Coding index	—	25.8
Providers	8	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-09-21	2026-04-01
Retirement	—	2026-10-26

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Trinity Large Thinking?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.2× cheaper than Trinity Large Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Trinity Large Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens. Trinity Large Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Trinity Large Thinking ≈ $900.00.

More comparisons