Hy4 vs Trinity Large Thinking
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Trinity Large Thinking is 38% cheaper than Hy4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Hy4 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (34.6 vs 10.8). Hy4 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| Hy4 | Trinity Large Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.42 | $0.25 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.25 | $0.80 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.63 | $0.39 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.021 | $0.06 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 80K |
| Intelligence index | 34.6 | 10.8 |
| Coding index | — | 25.8 |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-11-04 | 2026-04-01 |
| Retirement | — | 2026-10-26 |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Hy4 or Trinity Large Thinking?
Trinity Large Thinking is 38% cheaper than Hy4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Hy4 vs Trinity Large Thinking: which has a bigger context window?
Hy4: 1,048,576 tokens. Trinity Large Thinking: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Hy4 ≈ $1,459, Trinity Large Thinking ≈ $900.00.
More comparisons
Hy4 vs Gemini 4 CarbonHy4 vs Claude Fable 5.2Hy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashHy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHy4 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalHy4 vs GPT-6.1 TerraHy4 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProHy4 vs Kimi K3.1 ProHy4 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashHy4 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Hy4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLHy4 vs Gemini 4 ArgonHy4 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Hy4 vs Nano Banana 2.1Hy4 vs Mistral Large 4Hy4 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProTrinity Large Thinking vs Gemini 4 CarbonTrinity Large Thinking vs Claude Fable 5.2Trinity Large Thinking vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashTrinity Large Thinking vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashTrinity Large Thinking vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalTrinity Large Thinking vs GPT-6.1 TerraTrinity Large Thinking vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProTrinity Large Thinking vs Kimi K3.1 Pro