Claude Fable 5.2 vs Trinity Large Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Arcee Ai

Trinity Large Thinking

Arcee Ai
$0.25 / $0.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Arcee Ai
Verdict: Trinity Large Thinking is 41.3× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (64.6 vs 10.8). Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Fable 5.2Trinity Large Thinking
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.25
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.80
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.39
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.06
Context window1M262K
Max output128K80K
Intelligence index64.610.8
Coding index—25.8
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-04-01
Retirement—2026-10-26

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is 41.3× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Trinity Large Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Trinity Large Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Trinity Large Thinking ≈ $900.00.

More comparisons