MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi

$0.14 / $0.28

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)

$0.45 / $3.50

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 6.9× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 128K).

	MiMo-V2.6-Flash	Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M	$0.14	$0.45
Output price / 1M	$0.28	$3.50
Blended price (3:1)	$0.18	$1.21
Cached input / 1M	$0.0028	—
Context window	1.1M	128K
Max output	131K	16K
Intelligence index	26.7	—
Coding index	—	22.1
Providers	8	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-09-21	2025-07-25
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 6.9× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 ≈ $2,650.

More comparisons