Llama Guard 4 12B vs Pareto 26.9

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Meta Llama

Llama Guard 4 12B

Meta Llama
$0.18 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
U

Pareto 26.9

Unbiased
$2.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Meta Llama
U
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 20.8× cheaper than Pareto 26.9 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Pareto 26.9 has the larger context window (262K vs 164K).
Llama Guard 4 12BPareto 26.9
Input price / 1M$0.18$2.50
Output price / 1M$0.18$7.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$3.75
Cached input / 1M—$0.25
Context window164K262K
Max output16K131K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers3—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-04-302026-10-13
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or Pareto 26.9?

Llama Guard 4 12B is 20.8× cheaper than Pareto 26.9 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama Guard 4 12B vs Pareto 26.9: which has a bigger context window?

Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. Pareto 26.9: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00, Pareto 26.9 ≈ $8,750.

More comparisons