Llama Guard 4 12B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Meta Llama

Llama Guard 4 12B

Meta Llama
$0.18 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.075 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Meta Llama
MiniMax
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 27% cheaper than Llama Guard 4 12B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 164K).
Llama Guard 4 12BMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.18$0.075
Output price / 1M$0.18$0.30
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$0.13
Cached input / 1M—$0.0075
Context window164K1M
Max output16K524K
Intelligence index—28.9
Coding index——
Providers314
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-04-302026-10-19
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 27% cheaper than Llama Guard 4 12B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama Guard 4 12B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00, MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $300.00.

More comparisons