DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Llama Guard 4 12B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta Llama

Llama Guard 4 12B

Meta Llama
$0.18 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Meta Llama
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 31% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 164K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Llama Guard 4 12B
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.18
Output price / 1M$0.60$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$0.18
Cached input / 1M$0.003—
Context window1M164K
Max output393K16K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers423
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-172025-04-30
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Llama Guard 4 12B?

Llama Guard 4 12B is 31% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Llama Guard 4 12B: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $600.00, Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00.

More comparisons