Claude Fable 5.2 vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
S

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Sao10k
$0.85 / $0.85
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
S
Verdict: Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 18.8× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Claude Fable 5.2Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.85
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.85
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.85
Cached input / 1M$0.20—
Context window1M131K
Max output128K16K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index——
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-11-072024-08-28
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 18.8× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 ≈ $2,125.

More comparisons