GPT-6.1 Terra vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

GPT-6.1 Terra

OpenAI

$1.00 / $5.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Sao10k

$0.85 / $0.85

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 2.4× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6.1 Terra has the larger context window (1.1M vs 131K).

	GPT-6.1 Terra	Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Input price / 1M	$1.00	$0.85
Output price / 1M	$5.00	$0.85
Blended price (3:1)	$2.00	$0.85
Cached input / 1M	$0.05	—
Context window	1.1M	131K
Max output	128K	16K
Intelligence index	51.3	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	7	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	No
Tool calling	Yes	No
Released	2026-10-26	2024-08-28
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Terra or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 2.4× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GPT-6.1 Terra vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: which has a bigger context window?

GPT-6.1 Terra: 1,050,000 tokens. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6.1 Terra ≈ $4,500, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 ≈ $2,125.

More comparisons