DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek

$0.098 / $0.29

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Sao10k

$0.85 / $0.85

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 5.8× cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).

	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Input price / 1M	$0.098	$0.85
Output price / 1M	$0.29	$0.85
Blended price (3:1)	$0.15	$0.85
Cached input / 1M	$0.0029	—
Context window	1M	131K
Max output	393K	16K
Intelligence index	28.6	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	47	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	No
Tool calling	Yes	No
Released	2026-10-17	2024-08-28
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 5.8× cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 ≈ $2,125.

More comparisons