Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

S

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Sao10k
$0.85 / $0.85
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
S
MiniMax
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 3.2× cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.85$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.85$0.60
Blended price (3:1)$0.85$0.26
Cached input / 1M—$0.015
Context window131K1M
Max output16K524K
Intelligence index—29.1
Coding index——
Providers—11
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2024-08-282026-10-19
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 3.2× cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: 131,072 tokens. MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 ≈ $2,125, MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00.

More comparisons