Nano Banana 2.1 vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Nano Banana 2.1

Google
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
S

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Sao10k
$0.85 / $0.85
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
S
Verdict: Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 3.5× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 has the larger context window (131K vs 66K).
Nano Banana 2.1Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.85
Output price / 1M$7.50$0.85
Blended price (3:1)$3.00$0.85
Cached input / 1M——
Context window66K131K
Max output59K16K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-062024-08-28
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 3.5× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2.1 vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 ≈ $2,125.

More comparisons