Hy4 vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Hy4 is 26% cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Hy4 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
| Hy4 | Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.42 | $0.85 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.25 | $0.85 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.63 | $0.85 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.021 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Max output | 66K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | 34.6 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-11-04 | 2024-08-28 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Hy4 or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?
Hy4 is 26% cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Hy4 vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: which has a bigger context window?
Hy4: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Hy4 ≈ $1,459, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 ≈ $2,125.
More comparisons
Hy4 vs Gemini 4 CarbonHy4 vs Claude Fable 5.2Hy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashHy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHy4 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalHy4 vs GPT-6.1 TerraHy4 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProHy4 vs Kimi K3.1 ProHy4 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashHy4 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Hy4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLHy4 vs Gemini 4 ArgonHy4 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Hy4 vs Nano Banana 2.1Hy4 vs Mistral Large 4Hy4 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs Gemini 4 CarbonLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs Claude Fable 5.2Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs GPT-6.1 TerraLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro