Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs Llama 4 Scout

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Sao10k

$0.85 / $0.85

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Llama 4 Scout

Meta Llama

$0.10 / $0.30

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 5.7× cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 131K).

	Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2	Llama 4 Scout
Input price / 1M	$0.85	$0.10
Output price / 1M	$0.85	$0.30
Blended price (3:1)	$0.85	$0.15
Cached input / 1M	—	—
Context window	131K	1.3M
Max output	16K	16K
Intelligence index	—	—
Coding index	—	8.2
Providers	—	4
Best provider uptime (30m)	—	100.0%
Vision input	No	Yes
Reasoning	No	No
Tool calling	No	Yes
Released	2024-08-28	2025-04-05
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is 5.7× cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: 131,072 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 ≈ $2,125, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.

More comparisons