GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ternary Bonsai 2 9B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0149 / $0.15
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Prism Ml

Ternary Bonsai 2 9B

Prism Ml
$0.08 / $0.13
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Prism Ml
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 46% cheaper than Ternary Bonsai 2 9B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashTernary Bonsai 2 9B
Input price / 1M$0.0149$0.08
Output price / 1M$0.15$0.13
Blended price (3:1)$0.0498$0.0925
Cached input / 1M$0.0149$0.04
Context window1M262K
Max output131K66K
Intelligence index27.8—
Coding index71.5—
Providers40—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-262026-10-16
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Ternary Bonsai 2 9B?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 46% cheaper than Ternary Bonsai 2 9B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ternary Bonsai 2 9B: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Ternary Bonsai 2 9B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $106.95, Ternary Bonsai 2 9B ≈ $225.00.

More comparisons