MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Ternary Bonsai 2 9B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.075 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Prism Ml

Ternary Bonsai 2 9B

Prism Ml
$0.08 / $0.13
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
Prism Ml
Verdict: Ternary Bonsai 2 9B is 30% cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
MiniMax M3.1 FlashTernary Bonsai 2 9B
Input price / 1M$0.075$0.08
Output price / 1M$0.30$0.13
Blended price (3:1)$0.13$0.0925
Cached input / 1M$0.0075$0.04
Context window1M262K
Max output524K66K
Intelligence index28.9—
Coding index——
Providers14—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-192026-10-16
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Ternary Bonsai 2 9B?

Ternary Bonsai 2 9B is 30% cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Ternary Bonsai 2 9B: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Ternary Bonsai 2 9B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $300.00, Ternary Bonsai 2 9B ≈ $225.00.

More comparisons