DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 9B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Prism Ml

Ternary Bonsai 2 9B

Prism Ml
$0.08 / $0.13
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Prism Ml
Verdict: Ternary Bonsai 2 9B is 2.8× cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Ternary Bonsai 2 9B
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.08
Output price / 1M$0.60$0.13
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$0.0925
Cached input / 1M$0.003$0.04
Context window1M262K
Max output393K66K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers42—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172026-10-16
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Ternary Bonsai 2 9B?

Ternary Bonsai 2 9B is 2.8× cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 9B: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Ternary Bonsai 2 9B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $600.00, Ternary Bonsai 2 9B ≈ $225.00.

More comparisons