GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.55 / $3.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
Q
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 5.4× cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (41.8 vs 18.4). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1.3M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashQwen3.5 397B A17B
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.55
Output price / 1M$0.50$3.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.24$1.29
Cached input / 1M$0.05$0.23
Context window1.3M262K
Max output944K236K
Intelligence index41.818.4
Coding index71.548.2
Providers31
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-262026-02-16
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 5.4× cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,310,720 tokens. Qwen3.5 397B A17B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $550.00, Qwen3.5 397B A17B ≈ $2,850.

More comparisons