GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0399 / $0.0784
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.60 / $3.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 27.3× cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashQwen3.5 397B A17B
Input price / 1M$0.0399$0.60
Output price / 1M$0.0784$3.60
Blended price (3:1)$0.0495$1.35
Cached input / 1M$0.03$0.12
Context window1M262K
Max output131K64K
Intelligence index27.8—
Coding index71.548.2
Providers42—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-262026-02-16
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 27.3× cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.5 397B A17B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Qwen3.5 397B A17B ≈ $3,000.

More comparisons