Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.60 / $3.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is 11.9× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Fable 5.2Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.60
Output price / 1M$40.00$3.60
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$1.35
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.12
Context window1M262K
Max output128K64K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index—48.2
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-02-16
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Qwen3.5 397B A17B is 11.9× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.5 397B A17B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Qwen3.5 397B A17B ≈ $3,000.

More comparisons