Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini 4 Carbon

Google
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.60 / $3.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is 3.0× cheaper than Gemini 4 Carbon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini 4 Carbon has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3.5 397B A17B
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.60
Output price / 1M$10.00$3.60
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$1.35
Cached input / 1M$0.10$0.12
Context window1M262K
Max output944K64K
Intelligence index60—
Coding index—48.2
Providers7—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-102026-02-16
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Carbon or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Qwen3.5 397B A17B is 3.0× cheaper than Gemini 4 Carbon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 4 Carbon: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.5 397B A17B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 4 Carbon ≈ $9,000, Qwen3.5 397B A17B ≈ $3,000.

More comparisons