GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0399 / $0.0784
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.45 / $3.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 24.5× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
GLM 5.3 FlashQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$0.0399$0.45
Output price / 1M$0.0784$3.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.0495$1.21
Cached input / 1M$0.03—
Context window1M128K
Max output131K16K
Intelligence index27.8—
Coding index71.522.1
Providers42—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-262025-07-25
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 24.5× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 ≈ $2,650.

More comparisons