GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0399 / $0.0784
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante

inclusionAI
$0.042 / $0.12
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
inclusionAI
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 21% cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Sante on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashLing 3.0 Flash Sante
Input price / 1M$0.0399$0.042
Output price / 1M$0.0784$0.12
Blended price (3:1)$0.0495$0.0623
Cached input / 1M$0.03$0.0084
Context window1M262K
Max output131K33K
Intelligence index27.8—
Coding index71.5—
Providers42—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-262026-09-04
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Ling 3.0 Flash Sante?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 21% cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Sante on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Ling 3.0 Flash Sante ≈ $145.60.

More comparisons