GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal

Z.ai (Zhipu)

$0.37 / $1.25

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante

inclusionAI

$0.042 / $0.12

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Sante is 9.5× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).

	GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal	Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
Input price / 1M	$0.37	$0.042
Output price / 1M	$1.25	$0.12
Blended price (3:1)	$0.59	$0.0623
Cached input / 1M	$0.075	$0.0084
Context window	1M	262K
Max output	131K	33K
Intelligence index	—	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	1	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-11-02	2026-09-04
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal or Ling 3.0 Flash Sante?

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante is 9.5× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal ≈ $1,365, Ling 3.0 Flash Sante ≈ $145.60.

More comparisons