GPT-6.1 Terra Pro vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

OpenAI

GPT-6.1 Terra Pro

OpenAI
$1.00 / $5.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante

inclusionAI
$0.042 / $0.12
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
OpenAI
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Sante is 32.1× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6.1 Terra Pro has the larger context window (1.1M vs 262K).
GPT-6.1 Terra ProLing 3.0 Flash Sante
Input price / 1M$1.00$0.042
Output price / 1M$5.00$0.12
Blended price (3:1)$2.00$0.0623
Cached input / 1M$0.05$0.0084
Context window1.1M262K
Max output128K33K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers6—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-262026-09-04
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Terra Pro or Ling 3.0 Flash Sante?

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante is 32.1× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GPT-6.1 Terra Pro vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante: which has a bigger context window?

GPT-6.1 Terra Pro: 1,050,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6.1 Terra Pro ≈ $4,500, Ling 3.0 Flash Sante ≈ $145.60.

More comparisons