Hy4 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Sante is 10.0× cheaper than Hy4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Hy4 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| Hy4 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.42 | $0.042 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.25 | $0.12 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.63 | $0.0623 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.021 | $0.0084 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 33K |
| Intelligence index | 34.6 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-11-04 | 2026-09-04 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Hy4 or Ling 3.0 Flash Sante?
Ling 3.0 Flash Sante is 10.0× cheaper than Hy4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Hy4 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante: which has a bigger context window?
Hy4: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Hy4 ≈ $1,459, Ling 3.0 Flash Sante ≈ $145.60.
More comparisons
Hy4 vs Gemini 4 CarbonHy4 vs Claude Fable 5.2Hy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashHy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHy4 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalHy4 vs GPT-6.1 TerraHy4 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProHy4 vs Kimi K3.1 ProHy4 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashHy4 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Hy4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLHy4 vs Gemini 4 ArgonHy4 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Hy4 vs Nano Banana 2.1Hy4 vs Mistral Large 4Hy4 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProLing 3.0 Flash Sante vs Gemini 4 CarbonLing 3.0 Flash Sante vs Claude Fable 5.2Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLing 3.0 Flash Sante vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashLing 3.0 Flash Sante vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalLing 3.0 Flash Sante vs GPT-6.1 TerraLing 3.0 Flash Sante vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLing 3.0 Flash Sante vs Kimi K3.1 Pro