GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 2.6× cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (41.8 vs 22.6). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1.3M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashLing 3.0 Flash Fin
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.06
Output price / 1M$0.50$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$0.24$0.09
Cached input / 1M$0.05$0.012
Context window1.3M262K
Max output944K236K
Intelligence index41.822.6
Coding index71.555.6
Providers31
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-262026-08-27
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 2.6× cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,310,720 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $550.00, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons