GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0399 / $0.0784
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

inclusionAI
$0.042 / $0.12
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
inclusionAI
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 21% cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (27.8 vs 22.6). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashLing 3.0 Flash Fin
Input price / 1M$0.0399$0.042
Output price / 1M$0.0784$0.12
Blended price (3:1)$0.0495$0.0623
Cached input / 1M$0.03$0.0084
Context window1M262K
Max output131K33K
Intelligence index27.822.6
Coding index71.555.6
Providers42—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-262026-08-27
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 21% cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ≈ $145.60.

More comparisons