GLM 5.3 Flash vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0399 / $0.0784
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
S

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Sao10k
$0.85 / $0.85
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
S
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 17.2× cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
GLM 5.3 FlashLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Input price / 1M$0.0399$0.85
Output price / 1M$0.0784$0.85
Blended price (3:1)$0.0495$0.85
Cached input / 1M$0.03—
Context window1M131K
Max output131K16K
Intelligence index27.8—
Coding index71.5—
Providers42—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-08-262024-08-28
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 17.2× cheaper than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 ≈ $2,125.

More comparisons