Nano Banana 2.1 vs Pareto 26.10
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Pareto 26.10 is 2.1× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Pareto 26.10 has the larger context window (1M vs 66K).
| Nano Banana 2.1 | Pareto 26.10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.50 | $0.80 |
| Output price / 1M | $7.50 | $3.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $3.00 | $1.40 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.03 |
| Context window | 66K | 1M |
| Max output | 59K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-06 | 2026-10-15 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or Pareto 26.10?
Pareto 26.10 is 2.1× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Nano Banana 2.1 vs Pareto 26.10: which has a bigger context window?
Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. Pareto 26.10: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750, Pareto 26.10 ≈ $3,200.
More comparisons
Nano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-6.1 TerraNano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProNano Banana 2.1 vs Kimi K3.1 ProNano Banana 2.1 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashNano Banana 2.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Nano Banana 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNano Banana 2.1 vs Gemini 4 ArgonNano Banana 2.1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Nano Banana 2.1 vs Mistral Large 4Nano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProNano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-6.1 SolNano Banana 2.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Nano Banana 2.1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeNano Banana 2.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeNano Banana 2.1 vs Command A+Nano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProPareto 26.10 vs GPT-6.1 TerraPareto 26.10 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProPareto 26.10 vs Kimi K3.1 ProPareto 26.10 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashPareto 26.10 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Pareto 26.10 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLPareto 26.10 vs Gemini 4 ArgonPareto 26.10 vs Claude Haiku 5.5