Nano Banana 2.1 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Nano Banana 2.1

Google
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.075 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
MiniMax
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 22.9× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 66K).
Nano Banana 2.1MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.075
Output price / 1M$7.50$0.30
Blended price (3:1)$3.00$0.13
Cached input / 1M—$0.0075
Context window66K1M
Max output59K524K
Intelligence index—28.9
Coding index——
Providers114
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-062026-10-19
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 22.9× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2.1 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750, MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $300.00.

More comparisons