DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Nano Banana 2.1

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek

$0.15 / $0.60

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Nano Banana 2.1

Google

$1.50 / $7.50

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 11.4× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 66K).

	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	Nano Banana 2.1
Input price / 1M	$0.15	$1.50
Output price / 1M	$0.60	$7.50
Blended price (3:1)	$0.26	$3.00
Cached input / 1M	$0.003	—
Context window	1M	66K
Max output	393K	59K
Intelligence index	—	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	42	1
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	100.0%
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-10-17	2026-10-06
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Nano Banana 2.1?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 11.4× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Nano Banana 2.1: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $600.00, Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750.

More comparisons