Ember-1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 30.0× cheaper than Ember-1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ember-1 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
| Ember-1 | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $3.00 | $0.20 |
| Output price / 1M | $15.00 | $0.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $6.00 | $0.20 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.30 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Max output | 944K | 118K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-09-24 | 2026-06-04 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 30.0× cheaper than Ember-1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Ember-1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?
Ember-1: 1,048,576 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ember-1 ≈ $13,500, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.
More comparisons
Ember-1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeEmber-1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeEmber-1 vs Command A+Ember-1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProEmber-1 vs GPT-6 LunaEmber-1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProEmber-1 vs GPT-6 SolEmber-1 vs Claude Opus 5.5Ember-1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedEmber-1 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashEmber-1 vs Grok 4.7Ember-1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashEmber-1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXEmber-1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashEmber-1 vs GPT-6 AstraEmber-1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GLM 5.3 PrimeNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Command A+Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GPT-6 Luna ProNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GPT-6 LunaNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GPT-6 Sol ProNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GPT-6 SolNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Claude Opus 5.5