Ember-1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 34.3× cheaper than Ember-1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| Ember-1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $3.00 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $15.00 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $6.00 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.30 | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 944K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.3% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-24 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 34.3× cheaper than Ember-1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Ember-1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Ember-1: 1,048,576 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ember-1 ≈ $13,500, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
Ember-1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeEmber-1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeEmber-1 vs Command A+Ember-1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProEmber-1 vs GPT-6 LunaEmber-1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProEmber-1 vs GPT-6 SolEmber-1 vs Claude Opus 5.5Ember-1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedEmber-1 vs Grok 4.7Ember-1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashEmber-1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXEmber-1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashEmber-1 vs GPT-6 AstraEmber-1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProEmber-1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5