Ember-1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 34.3× cheaper than Ember-1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).
| Ember-1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $3.00 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $15.00 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $6.00 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.30 | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.1M |
| Max output | 944K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | 26.7 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 8 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-24 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 34.3× cheaper than Ember-1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Ember-1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Ember-1: 1,048,576 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ember-1 ≈ $13,500, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
Ember-1 vs Gemini 4 CarbonEmber-1 vs Claude Fable 5.2Ember-1 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashEmber-1 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashEmber-1 vs Hy4Ember-1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalEmber-1 vs GPT-6.1 TerraEmber-1 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProEmber-1 vs Kimi K3.1 ProEmber-1 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashEmber-1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Ember-1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLEmber-1 vs Gemini 4 ArgonEmber-1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Ember-1 vs Nano Banana 2.1Ember-1 vs Mistral Large 4MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Hy4MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro