DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ember-1
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 28.6× cheaper than Ember-1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Ember-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.14 | $3.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.42 | $15.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.21 | $6.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.0042 | $0.30 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 944K |
| Intelligence index | 39.5 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 26 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-10 | 2026-09-24 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Ember-1?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 28.6× cheaper than Ember-1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ember-1: which has a bigger context window?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Ember-1: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $490.00, Ember-1 ≈ $13,500.
More comparisons
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Command A+DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6 LunaDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6 SolDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.7DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6 AstraDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Ember-1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeEmber-1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeEmber-1 vs Command A+Ember-1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProEmber-1 vs GPT-6 LunaEmber-1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProEmber-1 vs GPT-6 SolEmber-1 vs Claude Opus 5.5