Ember-1 vs GPT-6 Luna
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GPT-6 Luna is 30.0× cheaper than Ember-1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6 Luna has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).
| Ember-1 | GPT-6 Luna | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $3.00 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $15.00 | $0.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $6.00 | $0.20 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.30 | $0.01 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.1M |
| Max output | 944K | 128K |
| Intelligence index | — | 37.3 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 7 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-24 | 2026-09-22 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or GPT-6 Luna?
GPT-6 Luna is 30.0× cheaper than Ember-1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Ember-1 vs GPT-6 Luna: which has a bigger context window?
Ember-1: 1,048,576 tokens. GPT-6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ember-1 ≈ $13,500, GPT-6 Luna ≈ $450.00.
More comparisons
Ember-1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeEmber-1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeEmber-1 vs Command A+Ember-1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProEmber-1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProEmber-1 vs GPT-6 SolEmber-1 vs Claude Opus 5.5Ember-1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedEmber-1 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashEmber-1 vs Grok 4.7Ember-1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashEmber-1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXEmber-1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashEmber-1 vs GPT-6 AstraEmber-1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProEmber-1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)GPT-6 Luna vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-6 Luna vs Command A+GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 SolGPT-6 Luna vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Luna vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed