GLM 5.3 Prime vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 Prime

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$2.80 / $8.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 21.5× cheaper than GLM 5.3 Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Prime has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
GLM 5.3 PrimeNemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$2.80$0.20
Output price / 1M$8.80$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$4.30$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.56
Context window1M131K
Max output131K118K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers11
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-232026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Prime or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 21.5× cheaper than GLM 5.3 Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Prime vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Prime: 1,000,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Prime ≈ $10,000, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons