Ember-1 vs Grok 4.7
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Grok 4.7 is 2.5× cheaper than Ember-1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ember-1 has the larger context window (1M vs 500K).
| Ember-1 | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $3.00 | $1.60 |
| Output price / 1M | $15.00 | $4.80 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $6.00 | $2.40 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.30 | $0.40 |
| Context window | 1M | 500K |
| Max output | 944K | 450K |
| Intelligence index | — | 46.4 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-24 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is 2.5× cheaper than Ember-1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Ember-1 vs Grok 4.7: which has a bigger context window?
Ember-1: 1,048,576 tokens. Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ember-1 ≈ $13,500, Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600.
More comparisons
Ember-1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeEmber-1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeEmber-1 vs Command A+Ember-1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProEmber-1 vs GPT-6 LunaEmber-1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProEmber-1 vs GPT-6 SolEmber-1 vs Claude Opus 5.5Ember-1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedEmber-1 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashEmber-1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashEmber-1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXEmber-1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashEmber-1 vs GPT-6 AstraEmber-1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProEmber-1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5