Command A+ vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

C

Command A+

Cohere
$0.30 / $1.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
C
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 3.0× cheaper than Command A+ on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Command A+ has the larger context window (192K vs 131K).
Command A+Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.20
Output price / 1M$1.50$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.60$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.15
Context window192K131K
Max output64K118K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers11
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-222026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 3.0× cheaper than Command A+ on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Command A+ vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

Command A+: 192,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A+ ≈ $1,350, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons