DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek

$0.14 / $0.42

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen (Alibaba)

$2.00 / $6.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 14.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (39.9 vs 39.5).

	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash	Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input price / 1M	$0.14	$2.00
Output price / 1M	$0.42	$6.00
Blended price (3:1)	$0.21	$3.00
Cached input / 1M	$0.0042	$0.25
Context window	1M	1M
Max output	131K	131K
Intelligence index	39.5	39.9
Coding index	—	71.9
Providers	26	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-09-10	2026-08-12
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 14.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $490.00, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons