Claude Fable 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek
$0.022 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
DeepSeek
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 137.3× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Fable 5.2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.022
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.40
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.12
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.004
Context window1M1M
Max output128K944K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index——
Providers536
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-09-10
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 137.3× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $244.00.

More comparisons