DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 20.4× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input price / 1M$0.098$2.00
Output price / 1M$0.29$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.0029$0.25
Context window1M1M
Max output393K131K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index—71.9
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172026-08-12
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 20.4× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons