Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
DeepSeek
Verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 is 24% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.50$0.60
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.26
Cached input / 1M$0.01$0.003
Context window1M1M
Max output128K393K
Intelligence index36.2—
Coding index——
Providers1042
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-072026-10-17
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 24% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $600.00.

More comparisons