DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek

$0.03 / $0.32

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen (Alibaba)

$2.00 / $6.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 29.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (39.9 vs 34.3). DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).

	DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731	Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input price / 1M	$0.03	$2.00
Output price / 1M	$0.32	$6.00
Blended price (3:1)	$0.10	$3.00
Cached input / 1M	$0.016	$0.25
Context window	1.3M	1M
Max output	944K	131K
Intelligence index	34.3	39.9
Coding index	69.1	71.9
Providers	30	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	No	No
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-07-31	2026-08-12
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 29.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,310,720 tokens. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ≈ $220.00, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons