Claude Fable 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek
$0.0434 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
DeepSeek
Verdict: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 148.8× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Fable 5.2DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.0434
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.30
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.11
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.035
Context window1M1M
Max output128K944K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index—69.1
Providers527
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-07-31
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 148.8× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ≈ $236.80.

More comparisons