Command A+ vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Command A+ is 6.7× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (54.5 vs 6.2). GPT-6.1 Sol has the larger context window (1.1M vs 192K).
| Command A+ | GPT-6.1 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.30 | $2.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.50 | $10.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.60 | $4.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.15 | $0.10 |
| Context window | 192K | 1.1M |
| Max output | 64K | 128K |
| Intelligence index | 6.2 | 54.5 |
| Coding index | 27.8 | — |
| Providers | 1 | 9 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-29 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A+ or GPT-6.1 Sol?
Command A+ is 6.7× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A+ vs GPT-6.1 Sol: which has a bigger context window?
Command A+: 192,000 tokens. GPT-6.1 Sol: 1,050,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A+ ≈ $1,350, GPT-6.1 Sol ≈ $9,000.
More comparisons
Command A+ vs GPT-6.1 TerraCommand A+ vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProCommand A+ vs Kimi K3.1 ProCommand A+ vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashCommand A+ vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Command A+ vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLCommand A+ vs Gemini 4 ArgonCommand A+ vs Claude Haiku 5.5Command A+ vs Nano Banana 2.1Command A+ vs Mistral Large 4Command A+ vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProCommand A+ vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Command A+ vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6.1 TerraGPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT-6.1 Sol vs Kimi K3.1 ProGPT-6.1 Sol vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT-6.1 Sol vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-6.1 Sol vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGPT-6.1 Sol vs Gemini 4 ArgonGPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Haiku 5.5