Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Command A+
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Command A+ is 6.7× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 192K).
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Command A+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.00 | $0.30 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $1.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.00 | $0.60 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.20 | $0.15 |
| Context window | 1M | 192K |
| Max output | 128K | 64K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 8 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 97.8% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-28 | 2026-09-22 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Command A+?
Command A+ is 6.7× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Command A+: which has a bigger context window?
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Command A+: 192,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Sonnet 5.5 ≈ $9,000, Command A+ ≈ $1,350.
More comparisons
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 SolClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Grok 4.7Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Command A+ vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 SolCommand A+ vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A+ vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed