Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Q

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.20 / $2.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.03 / $0.13
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Q
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.7 Flash is 13.6× cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.7 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 82K).
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Qwen3.7 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.20$0.03
Output price / 1M$2.40$0.13
Blended price (3:1)$0.75$0.055
Cached input / 1M$0.006
Context window82K1M
Max output33K66K
Intelligence index9.8
Coding index12.1
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-08-282026-07-27
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is 13.6× cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.7 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: 81,920 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,600, Qwen3.7 Flash ≈ $125.00.

More comparisons