Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

X

Grok 4.7

xAI
$1.60 / $4.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.20 / $2.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
X
Q
Verdict: Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 3.2× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.7 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (46.4 vs 9.8). Grok 4.7 has the larger context window (500K vs 82K).
Grok 4.7Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$1.60$0.20
Output price / 1M$4.80$2.40
Blended price (3:1)$2.40$0.75
Cached input / 1M$0.40
Context window500K82K
Max output450K33K
Intelligence index46.49.8
Coding index12.1
Providers4
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-212025-08-28
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 3.2× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: 81,920 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,600.

More comparisons